![]() By excluding AI material from those definitions, the guild proposal would protect writers from losing a share of credit or residuals due to the use of AI software. Those definitions are key to determining credit and residual compensation in the guild contract. The guild’s tweets say something else, referring to how AI material is “used” rather than how it is “considered.” The tweets say that AI material cannot be “used” as source material and that AI cannot generate covered “literary material.” The proposal states only that AI material - if used - will not be considered as literary or source material. The entirety of WGA proposal reads: “ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND SIMILAR TECHNOLOGIES: Provide that written material produced by artificial intelligence programs and similar technologies will not be considered source material or literary material on any MBA-covered project.” The subsequent tweets, however, differ from the language of the proposal. The first tweet sums up the intent of the proposal, which is to regulate AI in such a way to preserve writers’ working standards. #WGAStrong □1/7- Writers Guild of America West March 22, 2023 The WGA’s proposal to regulate use of material produced using artificial intelligence or similar technologies ensures the Companies can’t use AI to undermine writers’ working standards including compensation, residuals, separated rights and credits. If a screenplay is based on source material, then it is not considered an “original screenplay.” The writer may also get only a “screenplay by” credit, rather than a “written by” credit.Ī “written by” credit entitles the writer to the full residual for the project, while a “screenplay by” credit gets 75%.īy declaring that ChatGPT cannot write “source material,” the guild would be saying that a writer could adapt an AI-written short story and still get full “written by” credit. “Source material” refers to things like novels, plays and magazine articles, on which a screenplay may be based. If an AI program cannot produce “literary material,” then it cannot be considered a “writer” on a project. “Literary material” is a fundamental term in the WGA’s minimum basic agreement - it is what a “writer” produces (including stories, treatments, screenplays, dialogue, sketches, etc.). Its features can help you create short film scripts that immerse readers in the story without slowing down the narrative. Sudowrite is an AI writing assistant used by both novelists and film writers. Those terms are key for assigning writing credits, which in turn have a big impact on residual compensation. Here are the best AI tools to write scripts for films: best Option for Writing Short Scripts. ![]() The WGA proposal states simply that AI-generated material will not be considered “literary material” or “source material.” ![]() It’s not yet clear whether the AMPTP, which represents the studios, will be receptive to the idea. The guild’s proposal was discussed in the first bargaining session on Monday with the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers. The proposal does not address the scenario in which an AI program writes a script entirely on its own, without help from a person. It appears to be intended to allow writers to benefit from the technology without getting dragged into credit arbitrations with software manufacturers. We’ll be replaced with Frankenstein spoonfuls of our own work.”Īll episodes of “The Fall of the House of Usher” are now available to watch on Netflix.In effect, the proposal would treat AI as a tool - like Final Draft or a pencil - rather than as a writer. “And if they can do this with actors, they can do it with writers, directors, cinematographers - everyone. “I stress that this is an existential threat,” she said. Justine Bateman, an adviser to SAG-AFTRA on AI issues, recently spoke with Variety about how deeply the tech could infiltrate Hollywood. “Let’s wait 20 years, and if an AI wins an Oscar for best screenplay, I think we’ve got to take them seriously.” “I just don’t believe that a disembodied mind that’s just regurgitating what other embodied minds have said will ever have something that’s going to move an audience,” Cameron said. Director and screenwriter James Cameron recently spoke to CTV News about his skepticism in using AI to pen successful scripts. Down the line we could mimic human consciousness.”Īlthough the scene was written and filmed well before the dual WGA and SAG-AFTRA strikes, AI usage in Hollywood one of the key concerns of the unions. Roderick looks skeptical and retorts, “Not well,” with Madeline making a chilling prediction: “You’ll see.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |